?

Log in

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Comments

writerspleasure
Jun. 29th, 2012 09:45 am (UTC)
You're stuck in a robotic mode.

Listen carefully to a simple explanation: you're not a serious reasoner, at least here. (You might be lovely offline, but here you are an ass.) Therefore, you don't receive serious argument. This is what I'm talking about re. conversions: you can't start out as a snark, and then profess to suddenly want to reason, then flip back into snarking.

Interesting psychological confession about the superiority.

Sleep well. : )
tatjna
Jun. 29th, 2012 07:40 pm (UTC)
I did sleep well, thank you.

Now, let me keep this simple. I don't care if you can't/won't debate the point with me, that's not why I returned to this thread. I returned because I don't like it when fuckwits like you misrepresent me in other forums. I returned for the benefit of those who might follow that link here, to do two things:

1. Make it clear that my snark was, in fact, expressing a dissenting opinion.

2. Create a thread in which you demonstrate just how pissy you are about it.

Achievement, as they say, unlocked.

Now, I'm done. Congratulations, you get the last word. Please, spend more of your time explaining to me why I'm not worth your time.
writerspleasure
Jun. 29th, 2012 08:58 pm (UTC)
"Dissenting opinion[s]" are serious and occur in a rational setting. You, by contrast, are a snarker and are writing here. Q.E.D.

Oh, you're wonderfully worth my time. Mocking the Stupids is never time wasted!

[ And autolulz at replying to old threads. Clearly my good example infects. ]

Have a joyous afternoon. : )

Profile

WHAT NOW!?
anti_feminism
Who said it was about equality anyway?

Latest Month

June 2016
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Golly Kim