Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry


Jun. 29th, 2012 09:32 am (UTC)
Lead off with snark, and as a snarker shall ye be treated. No instant reformations or conversions along the way.

( Also, memory is not magically erased. You've done it before. You're not here to opine or reason. )
Jun. 29th, 2012 09:38 am (UTC)
No, you're right. Mostly I'm here to point and laugh at you, because mostly the things you say are laughable.

However, my opinion is dissenting, mostly because I disagree with almost everything you say. And I have historically opined and reasoned and discovered that your responses, as this one has been, are exactly as you are described in my note - pompous. Frankly, it puts me off wanting to engage more deeply.

It's also noteworthy that I've had discussions with evo-psych fans many times and it gets old refuting the same old assumptions over and over again. So here. A summary of why I'd rather snap off a one-line snark that amuses people than engage you seriously. Make sure you read the comments, you might learn something.
Jun. 29th, 2012 09:40 am (UTC)
You ... think I'm interested in your opinions? Or want you to engage more?

I consider you a clown. Now, bumble off and go talk to the Stupids.
Jun. 29th, 2012 09:43 am (UTC)
Hahaha funnily enough, I was just coming to realise that you don't actually have an argument of your own.

But please, continue to pretend you're above it all if it makes you feel more superior. I'm off to bed. 'Night!

Jun. 29th, 2012 09:45 am (UTC)
You're stuck in a robotic mode.

Listen carefully to a simple explanation: you're not a serious reasoner, at least here. (You might be lovely offline, but here you are an ass.) Therefore, you don't receive serious argument. This is what I'm talking about re. conversions: you can't start out as a snark, and then profess to suddenly want to reason, then flip back into snarking.

Interesting psychological confession about the superiority.

Sleep well. : )
Jun. 29th, 2012 07:40 pm (UTC)
I did sleep well, thank you.

Now, let me keep this simple. I don't care if you can't/won't debate the point with me, that's not why I returned to this thread. I returned because I don't like it when fuckwits like you misrepresent me in other forums. I returned for the benefit of those who might follow that link here, to do two things:

1. Make it clear that my snark was, in fact, expressing a dissenting opinion.

2. Create a thread in which you demonstrate just how pissy you are about it.

Achievement, as they say, unlocked.

Now, I'm done. Congratulations, you get the last word. Please, spend more of your time explaining to me why I'm not worth your time.
Jun. 29th, 2012 08:58 pm (UTC)
"Dissenting opinion[s]" are serious and occur in a rational setting. You, by contrast, are a snarker and are writing here. Q.E.D.

Oh, you're wonderfully worth my time. Mocking the Stupids is never time wasted!

[ And autolulz at replying to old threads. Clearly my good example infects. ]

Have a joyous afternoon. : )


Who said it was about equality anyway?

Latest Month

June 2016


Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Golly Kim